Døgn vs Timing
Last updated: July 2026
Timing is the closest comparison here — an excellent Mac app that automatically records app and window usage and turns it into time entries with powerful rules. Its automatic capture is genuinely best-in-class. Døgn overlaps but aims elsewhere: project timers, AI-session tracking, and the time → invoice loop across the kveik suite.
Where Timing is the better fit
- Automatic activity capture from app and window usage is exceptional.
- A mature, flexible rules engine to categorize time without manual timers.
- Detailed productivity and time-review reporting.
- A refined, long-established native Mac app.
- Great for reconstructing where your day actually went.
Where Døgn is the better fit
- Automatic tracking of AI coding sessions (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity) with on-device summaries as the entry description.
- One-time purchase rather than a subscription.
- A local KveikGraph time-entry sync to the living invoice draft owned by tjent.
- Fits the kveik suite: folo hands finished meetings to Døgn as billable time.
- Menu-bar project timers with live per-project earnings and a 24-hour day timeline.
At a glance
| Feature | Døgn | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | One-time purchase | Subscription |
| Platform | macOS native | macOS native |
| Where data lives | On your Mac | On your Mac |
| Automatic capture | AI sessions + activity | App/window usage + rules (excellent) |
| Project timers | One click, parallel | More review-oriented |
| Time → invoice | Local graph → tjent draft | Not a focus |
| Suite integration | folo meetings import | Standalone |
The short version
Pick Timing if best-in-class automatic activity capture and a deep rules engine are what you care about most.
Pick Døgn if you want AI-session tracking, one-click project timers, a one-time price, and a straight line from tracked time to an invoice.
Questions, answered
Is Døgn’s automatic tracking as good as Timing’s?
Honestly, Timing’s general app/window activity capture and rules engine are best-in-class. Døgn’s automatic strength is specifically AI coding sessions, plus one-click project timers and the invoice loop.
Are both local and private?
Both store primary tracking data on your Mac. Døgn additionally has explicit configured-webhook and connected-MCP boundaries; the main structural differences are pricing (Døgn one-time vs Timing subscription) and Døgn’s local KveikGraph sync to the draft owned by tjent.
Keep comparing
Back to all Døgn comparisons, or look at Døgn vs Toggl Track and Døgn vs Harvest.